James H. Moss (JHMoss@LAWYERNET.COM)
Tue, 4 Aug 1998 16:38:50 -0600
I have not seen a single post that support's hazing. I have seen posts that
disagree with the definition of hazing. I believe that it would be quite
inaccurate and unfair to characterize the comments as supporting hazing when
the statements are differences whether or not the activity is hazing.
I do get a giggle out of the damages that some of these issues cause.
"irreparable psychological harm" and "severely damaging the character" of
scouts I hope is meant to emphasize a personal opinion rather than a flat
out statement from someone who know those statements mean.
Yours in Scouting
12340 W. Alameda Pkwy., Lakewood, CO 80228-2841
Eagle Class of 69, Vigil, Denver Area Council
Terry Howerton Sakima Group, Inc. SCOUTER Magazine Kansas City