Cheryl Singhal (csinghal@CAPACCESS.ORG)
Tue, 3 Dec 1996 10:51:18 -0500
On Tue, 3 Dec 1996, Tom Petrik wrote:
> And perhaps the realization that a growing unit is a healthy unit and
> therefore an accurate measurement of "quality".
Bigger = better? I don't think so. Not always, not usually. (AT&T and
AMTRAK seem to be the exceptions that prove the rule here <g>).
Note too that under the rules (as reported here at all events), a troop
of 6 boys who adds 1 boy would be the QU equal of a troop of 215 who adds
While a larger troop may offer more opportunities, it is not by-
definition better in terms of outcome for an individual member. Factors
other than the "quality" of the program often enter into Troop decisions;
all other things being equal, perhaps the quality might be the deciding
factor, but all other things are rarely equal.
Terry Howerton Sakima Group, Inc. SCOUTER Magazine Kansas City