Re: CO-ED SCOUTS
Norman J. MacLeod (gaelwolf@MARLIN.SSNET.COM)
Tue, 28 Mar 1995 07:38:02 EST
In response -
>On Sat, 25 Mar 1995, Norman J. MacLeod wrote:
>> Campfire, as good as it is, is neither Boy Scouts or Girl Scouts. Neither is
>Here we go again, now in scouts-l. Just because Camp Fire was NOT founded
>by BP, it seems to be considered inferior.
Please go back and read what I said. There is nothing there that says that
Camp Fire is in any way inferior. I was saying that Camp Fire is different.
Not better, not worse - just different.
There are a lot of people who prefer to join Scouting as opposed to joining
Camp Fire, for whatever their reasons may be.
My post was in response to someone writing to the effect that, if they
desired a co-ed Scouting programme for their kids, they could join Camp
Fire, since it is already co-ed.
I certainly did NOT intend to stomp on your toes.
Terry Howerton Sakima Group, Inc. SCOUTER Magazine Kansas City